Main

April 18, 2008

Web 3.0... how important will your website be in 5 or 10 years?

Time for a little Friday speculation on a fine spring day in Michigan.

A visit to AdAge this morning linked me to an April 14 article at http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=126364 with a title that will scare some people: "It's Web 3.0 and Somebody Else's Content is King."

  • The article reports on a new online venture by Tina Brown, of New Yorker and Vanitry Fair fame, to launch an "aggregator" service that people will use to find information on topics that most interest them. Consider it a sophisticated version of present-day search. And an opportunity for focused online advertising.

The scary part of this for traditional communication and public relations plans is that the "aggregation" efforts won't be limited to "just" formal websites. Instead, they will pull content about a particular topic from any place on the web that somebody is creating it. For colleges and universities, that means that it will become even more likely that when people search for something at your school, what comes back will include a Rate My Professors site, a Wikipedia entry, videos on YouTube about your MBA program, and blogs that people write about you.

Even more so than today (when Wikipedia, for instance, is almost always returned by a Google search not far below your official site), you won't be able to control the content that people see about your institution. What's on your own website will become less and less important, especially in the early stages when people explore to build a list of possible "best fit" places to study. You can continue to describe your faculty as if they have sprung forth from Lake Wobegon, but people will pay even less attention to the superlatives than they do now after they've reviewed your Rate My Professors list.

Will "aggregation" services indeed successful in the Web 3.0 world? Various people are busy diasagreeing about that now. But you can be sure that movement toward continued collapse of the Internet walls that separate sources of information will continue.

Two other places are worth a visit if the this topic interests you:

Will individual college and university websites remain important? Yes. But their value as an early marketing tool will diminish in Web 3.0. People will visit your sites in the future because they have already put you high on their list of possible places to enroll. The experience they have on your website at that point, and how it compares to your competition, will play a major role in sustaining or diminishing initial interest levels. Two elements will rise in importance: 

  • More than before, strong marketing sites will be built around knowledge of the content your future students want to find and the tasks they want to accomplish on your site. That includes, for instance, information about real college costs similar to what a handful of colleges are providing with online cost estimators (see a list of 7 at http://bobjohnsonconsulting.com/blog1/2007/12/5_online_financial_aid_scholar.html).
  • You'll have to engage people with web-friendly language when they visit your site. Web editor positions will proliferate in a Web 3.0 world. And that is a very good thing.

Enough for now. More later. A great weekend to everyone.

 

[ Yahoo! ] options

September 12, 2007

Wikipedia... MarketingSherpa advice on fixing mistakes

In my earlier September 6 posting about MarketingSherpa's first of two articles on how to become engaged with Wikipedia and build good relations with the guardians of knowledge there, I promised to let readers know when the second article appeared... and here's that notice.

The subtitle for this article is "Damage Control."

The most important advice here is not to jump right in and change something that you think is a mistake or represents an interpretation that you don't agree with. Instead, use the "discussion" tab that exists for each entry to present your position and reach an agreement that a change is appropriate. Doing that will increase your credibility and help avoid the charge that you are secretly changing things simply for better public relations for your college or university.

Wikipedia links can increase traffic to your website

There's also a valuable section on how to use links in your Wikipedia article to increase traffic to your own website. As with other changes, the most important advice is to work with Wikipedia editors to either add new links or to change existing links because there's a better place for readers to arrive at your website.

Read the full article at http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.php?ident=30125# with open access for a few more days.

Links to more Wikipedia information

MarketingSherpa also provided links to learn even more and I'm listing a few of them here. The WikeScanner link below is the one that will let you learn more about who is already making changes on your entry.


Special Report: How to Get Your Company Listed on Wikipedia, Part I
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?ident=30116

WikiScanner:
http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr

Wired’s WikiWatch blog:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/wikiwatch/

Wikipedia’s Manual of Style: Companies, Corporations and Economic Information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Companies,_corpo
ations_and_economic_information

Wikipedia’s Conflict of Interest policy explained:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:COI

 

[ Yahoo! ] options

September 06, 2007

Wikipedia... Important for your brand identity

Just finished reading the first of two aticles appearing in MarketingSherpa, "Special Report: How to Get Your Company Listed on Wikipedia, Part 1" at http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.php?ident=30116

This is "open access" until September 12. I'll add the next article here as soon as it appears.

Right now, it is likely that you have a Wikipedia entry and unlikely that you know much about who started it. But as this article notes, Wikipedia is the 11th most popular website in the world (and some report higher than that in the United States). Many if not most colleges and universities will find that a Wikipedia link comes up on the first page of Google and Yahoo search results, often among the top 5 returned. You should assume that people are going to visit your Wikipedia content.

Wikipedia and Brand Identity

What people find on Wikipedia will help shape your brand identity. Every college and university should designate a person from marketing and communications to monitor your content. What's critical is understanding what you can and can't do when you find something you don't like.

What's valuable about this MarketSherpa article is the basic guidance on how to become a recognized and respected member of the Wikipedia content community. Volunteers are very serious about protecting Wikipedia from false content and particularly from contributions from marketers that are blatent attempts at self-promotion. This article will let anyone new to the Wikipedia world some initial clues on what's accepted behavior and how to establish yourself with the Wikipedia guardians.

Let Wikipedia Know Who You Are

The most important element: identify yourself right away as a representative of your organization who plans to monitor contributions to the site and make factual corrections. Don't even try to turn your Wikipedia entry into an online version of your admissions viewbook, capital campaign case statement, or annual report. MarketingSherpa refers to this person as your "Ambassador" to Wikipedia. Be sure to select a person who is a diplomat and who knows how to negotiate.

One area that every college should attend to is making sure that third-party endorsements of your faculty (grants won, articles accepted, and books published) appear in the content. Similarly, there doesn't appear to be anything wrong with listing the firms that take your students for internships and co-op placements. When in doubt, ask Wikipedia. And of course, make sure that the list of academic programs you offer is current. Establish an identity as a factual, regular contributor who can help build the reputation of the website.

Wikipedia is for International Students

Ready to check your listing now? Go along to http://www.wikipedia.org/ and use the search engine on that page. And note that Wikipedia articles are available in up to 10 languages now, with more on the way. Can you say "International student recruitment opportunity"?

[ Yahoo! ] options

July 18, 2007

Wikipedia... Search Marketing tips to edit your college entry

Wednesday morning today is final prep time before my Search Engine Marketing workshop this afternoon at the ACT Enrollment Planners Conference in Chicago. 

And so a quick note from today's issue of Search Engine Land as I was checking the latest Search Marketing news.

"SEO Tips and Tactics from a Wikipedia Insider" is a column by a person who volunteers to review and revise inappropriate changes to Wikipedia content. The focus here is on changes made by the offices of political figures to remove unflattering references to them that were indeed based on true facts.

Two elements stand out from this report:

  • Changes were spotted quickly by the Wikipedia volunteer corps, in part because it was usually easy to see who made them.
  • Edits to remove the "bad" content and in some cases restore what had been changed were also made very quickly.

But that doesn't mean that editors from college and universities (and political offices, for that matter) can't play an active role in updating Wikipedia content and achieving stronger search engine visibility. The article gives 8 "white hat" tips on how to do that without getting yourself in trouble with Wikipedia.

Spend some worthwhile moments at http://searchengineland.com/070717-113550.php for the details.

[ Yahoo! ] options

July 17, 2007

Pew Internet Research... Wikipedia user profile

Yesterday I was finishing my keynote presentation for the start next Sunday of the 2007 eduWeb conference in Baltimore.

The keynote title is "Marketing and the Web: Trends and Tribulations in Online Communications" and a key part of the message is the increasingly easy ability of "normal human beings" to access the web and add content without the help of web experts.

Doing the usual research, I came across an April 2007 report from the Pew Internet & American Life Project that I'd missed before (despite the email updates I get from them!).

At http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/212/report_display.asp you can read more about why Wikipedia is one of the 10 most popular websites and is likely to stay that way for some time. Take special note of the subhead introducing the report: Wikipedia is "particularly popular with the well-educated and current college-age students."

One reason Wikipedia will stay popular is the high rankings that Google search often gives to articles located there. College and university Wikipedia sites, as I noted in an earlier blog post, often rank in the top 5 listings when searching for them by name. The trial and the tribulation in this is the visible presence on the web of information that most colleges don't care to publish on their own websites. Consider this example:

And don't get caught up in an abstact discussion of whether or not what's posted on Wikipedia is accurate. If you see something that isn't right, either correct it yourself or join in the discussion about how it should change. A new form of democracy is emerging in online communicaitons. Experts in everything from content preperation to website design have a less important role than just 5 years ago or so. Join in. Have fun.

 

[ Yahoo! ] options

May 17, 2007

Wikipedia and Google... searching for your school

Google continues to gain market share among people using search engines and Wikipedia is among the Top 10 must visited websites in the United States.

If you or someone else at your college or university isn't checking your Wikipedia content regularly, it might be time to start doing that.

In the past few days, while searching for various schools, I've noticed that the URL for the Wikipedia entry is listed among the first 5 responses that appear. With the overall popularity of Wikipedia as an information source, it seems likely that more than a few people will make a visit to the Wikipedia location.

I'd love to see research among people who have visited both the official website and the Wikipedia counterpart as to which one has more credibility.

Here are four institutions and how the Wikipedia URL finished in Google searches over the last few days:

  • McDaniel College... fourth listing
  • Philadelphia University... fifth listing
  • University of Toronto... fourth listing
  • Hofstra University... fourth listing

Google for your school soon and see if it is listed as high as these. I've not done anything resembling a "scientific" review, but it does seem frequent enough to pay attention.

How useful are the Wikipedia entries? For basic information about the number of students enrolled and the academic programs offered, it is usually faster to visit Wikipedia than an official website. Pity about that, but it is often the case.

And don't forget the official seal. For some reason, most of the Wikipedia entries I've seen include the seal or crest of the university right on the front page.

If you haven't already, start checking your Wikipedia content soon.

[ Yahoo! ] options